A multinational professional services firm operating across multiple legal entities, geographies, and regulatory environments manages a high volume of complex commercial agreements.
A significant portion of these agreements involved multiple external counterparties and internal legal entities, including consortium arrangements, cross-border licensing deals, and joint delivery contracts. The client’s standardized CLM platform supported only one counterparty per contract record, creating a structural limitation for these agreement types.
Industry
Manufacturing
Tech Stack
Country
USA
The client’s standardized Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) platform supported only one counterparty per contract record. This structural constraint stood in direct opposition to the firm’s operational reality.
Specifically, the client required the ability to:
Because the platform follows a no-code, configuration-driven model, the solution had to work within native configuration capabilities rather than custom code.

We introduced a normalized background table called Contracting Parties and established a one-to-many relationship between the parent contract and this table. This allowed the platform to represent multiple parties without altering the core platform code.
Each Contracting Party record serves as a metadata-rich link containing:
We utilized the metadata within the Contracting Parties table to drive the platform's native engines:

The implemented architecture extended the single-counterparty data model to support multiple internal and external parties within the same contract structure:
The solution used native platform configuration rather than custom code, helping the firm remain on the platform’s standard upgrade path.
Reduced reliance on off-system spreadsheets and manual email approvals by centralizing contract-party information within the CLM platform.
Provides a more granular audit trail of the entities involved in an agreement, supporting compliance visibility.
Enabled global reporting on counterparty exposure and entity-specific obligations.
By shifting from a single-counterparty record model to a relational architecture, the solution supports multi-party agreements while staying within Agiloft’s configuration-driven environment.
Industry: Manufacturing
Industry: Manufacturing
Industry: Event Management
Industry: Healthcare
Industry: Gaming & Sports
Industry: Education